• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

US Military

  • Branches
    • Army
    • Navy
    • Air Force
    • Marine Corps
    • Coast Guard
    • National Guard
    • Air National Guard
    • Find A Recruiter
  • Find A Recruiter
  • Military Benefits
    • GI Bill
    • VA Loans
    • Military Scholarships
    • Military Friendly Colleges
    • Money
  • Jobs
    • Military Pay Chart
    • Veteran Jobs
    • Civilian Jobs
  • VA Loan Rates
  • Military News
    • Top News
    • Benefits
    • Careers
    • Education
    • Featured Columnists
      • Larry Fowler
      • Scott Ostrow
      • Kim Lengling
      • Dr. Sasha Toperich
      • Rick Stewart
  • GI Bill
  • VA Loans
  • Military Scholarships
  • Top Military-Friendly Colleges and Universities in America

Service Acquisitions Chiefs Testify on Reform

April 23, 2015 By larryf

WASHINGTON, April 23, 2015 – Top acquisition officials from the Army, Navy and Air Force testified before Congress yesterday on their collective efforts to make the defense acquisition process more effective and responsive to national security needs.

Heidi Shyu, assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology; Sean J. Stackley, assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition; and William A. LaPlante, assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition all appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee?s subcommittee on readiness and management support.

Industry Versus Government

Shyu contrasted her experiences in industry and government and urged Congress to empower program managers with the authorities necessary to be more agile in guiding programs to successful completion.

?Defense acquisition is a highly risk-averse, compliance-based process with a checklist mentality that has become unduly cumbersome,? she said. ?Prior to my service to the government, I spent 33 years working with the defense industry.?

Shyu explained that she controlled her own budget, held a reserve budget, and had the flexibility and ?trade space? to identify impacts of performance versus cost, schedule and technical risks.

On the government side, she said requirements are derived or changed without the full knowledge of cost, schedule or technical risk to the program.

Shyu also noted that on the government side, she?s encountered cumbersome paperwork requirements, slow hiring, changes to operational testing without consideration to program impacts and lack of flexibility to offer financial incentives.

Stark Differences

A stark difference, she noted, is what happens when a program runs into problems. ?What happens in industry?? she asked. ?Everybody would jump in to bail out the program manager, because you are bleeding cash. There?s a financial incentive to reduce loss, so everybody helps out the program manager.?

In government, she said, it becomes ?an opportunity to actually take the program manager?s money and use it for their stove-pipe purposes.?

Shyu cited this ?fundamental? lack of program manager authority, coupled with ?failure to properly align the various stakeholders? responsibilities? as the factor that most heavily has contributed to the critical shortcomings in the acquisition process.

?I urge Congress,? she said, ?to empower the [program managers] with the authority needed to help them guide the program successfully to completion in a manner that?s similarly to industry in which I could move very rapidly.?

Making Every Dollar Count

Stackley said the cost of delivering ?extraordinary capability? to the warfighters is proving increasingly difficult for the nation to bear.

He noted former Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates for his 2010 warning that ?given America?s difficult economic circumstances and perilous fiscal condition, military spending on things large and small can and should expect closer, harsher scrutiny.?

Shortly after that came the tenets of what is known today as the Defense Department?s Better Buying Power initiative, Stackley said.

?So today,? he added, ?in building our budget, every program — things large and small — is subject to answering four most basic questions: What will it cost to buy it? What will it buy us in performance? What can we afford? And what can we do to make it more affordable? Simply put, we must change the cost equation.?

He cited five basic principles: get the requirements right, perform to a stable plan, make every dollar count, build a skilled and experienced acquisitions workforce, and foster a healthy industrial base.

As Gates said, Stackley told the panel, what is necessary is a willingness to make hard choices.

Speed the ?Fundamental? Metric

LaPlante said speed is the fundamental metric in discussing agility and adaptability in acquisition.

?If you can do things fast, do it fast,? he said. ?Failing fast is better than doing things slow that may or may not succeed.?

LaPlante also noted ?promising signs? in acquisition reform, calling them ?good things that should be built upon.?

He added, ?I am always a believer in looking at what?s going well and building upon it.? The Better Buying Power initiative that Defense Secretary Ash Carter initiated when he was the Pentagon?s acquisition chief now carried forward with Frank Kendall, the present undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, are paying off, he said.

?The ?should-cost? savings that all three of our services are having are real, and they?re incredible,? LaPlante said. He emphasized that these savings do not fall into the cost avoidance category.

?People sometimes say it?s cost avoidance,? LaPlante said. ?No. Very specifically, they are real savings that?s paying off.?

Using Nontraditional Methods

LaPlante also said the Air Force has done some outreach in nontraditional ways to bring in academia or small businesses.

DoD Instruction 5000.02, signed Nov. 26, 2013, by Carter on his last day as deputy defense secretary, is designed to help in streamlining the acquisition process, LaPlante said.

?We?re trying things in the Air Force,? he added, ?and I know the other services are, outside of the acquisition [instruction], doing something that that?s called ?other transactional authority.? We?re doing an experiment next month on one of our systems to try to get folks under contract within a week if they impress us with one of their algorithms.?

Experiments like these need attention and encouragement, LaPlante said.

Filed Under: daniel articles, Top News

Recent Posts

  • How Was Military Time Created And Why?
  • The Best 5 US Military Bases In The World
  • Congrats To Recent Graduates And Is The Military A Great Place For Young People Today
  • The Best Jobs in the United States Army
  • Top 5  Military Home Loans for Active Duty Service Members
VA Loans

Primary Sidebar

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE

USMilitary.com is a privately owned website and is NOT AFFILIATED (or endorsed) with the U.S. GOVERNMENT, U.S. ARMED FORCES, or DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

USMilitary.com Career Guide

Sign up to receive USMilitary.com email updates and to hear what's going on with all military branches!

Featured Columnists

Larry Fowler

Larry Fowler is the publisher of USMilitary.com Network one of America's premier privately owned

Autobiography Compares Living Faithfully With Navy SEAL Training (BUD/S).

Scott Ostrow

Lt Col (Dr.) Scott A. Ostrow retired from the Air Force in September 2005 and has been teaching

Congrats To Recent Graduates And Is The Military A Great Place For Young People Today

Kim Lengling

Kim Lengling is a Air Force Veteran whose passion is to help support veterans and their

This Memorial Day: The Knock On The Door

Dr. Sasha Toperich

Dr. Sasha Toperich is the Senior Executive Vice President at Transatlantic Leadership

Sarraj’s Dangerous Dance With Power

Rick Stewart

Rick Stewart is a former United States Air Force Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE)

Announcing American Patriots Unsung Magazine

Nathan B. Nelson

Capt (ret) Nathan B. Nelson is the Director of Military Affairs for the 1st Congressional district

Three Critical Considerations for Every Veteran Prior to Leaving Active Duty

Laquan Daniels

Laquan Daniel is a military recruiting expert with over 17 years of specialized experience in the

Important News For Military Transitioning Veterans

Veteran Buzz

High-Paying Jobs for Military Veterans

5 High-Paying Jobs for Military Veterans

July 2, 2018 By Ben Ehinger

High Paying Jobs Not Requiring a Degree

June 28, 2018 By Ben Ehinger

7 Best Military Careers That Lead To High Paying Civilian Jobs

June 10, 2018 By larryf

VA Loans

Footer

  • Advertise With Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Write For US
  • Link to Us

Recent

  • How Was Military Time Created And Why?
  • The Best 5 US Military Bases In The World
  • Congrats To Recent Graduates And Is The Military A Great Place For Young People Today
  • The Best Jobs in the United States Army
  • Top 5  Military Home Loans for Active Duty Service Members

Search

© Copyright 2022 USMillitary
Web Design by Goebel Media Group


THIS IS A PRIVATE WEBSITE THAT IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, U.S. ARMED FORCES, OR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES HAVE NOT REVIEWED THIS INFORMATION. THIS SITE IS NOT CONNECTED WITH ANY GOVERNMENT AGENCY.